Skip to content

Lauren Oliver – The Spindlers

November 19, 2012

123. The Spindlers by Lauren Oliver (2012)

Read By: Simon Vance
Length: 4h 51m (256 pages)

Genre: Mid-Grade Fantasy Adventure

Started: 30 October 2012
Finished: 02 November 2012

Where did it come from? From the lovely folks at Harper Audio for review.
Why do I have it? While I didn’t capital-L Love Liesl & Po, Oliver’s previous mid-grade novel, I thought it was very original, and very maturely handled, and I was hoping for something similar.

Pesky kid brothers
are bad, but pesky soulless
kid brothers are worse.

Summary: When Liza wakes up one morning, her brother Patrick is gone. Physically, he’s still there at the breakfast table, but Liza knows that his soul is gone, stolen by the Spindlers, evil spider-like creatures that come in the night and take souls to their lair Below. Liza’s parents of course don’t believe her, so she must set out to save Patrick’s soul before it’s too late. The world Below is full of dangers, and even with the help of a giant talking rat named Mirabella, Liza may not be able to reach the realm of the Spindlers before it’s too late for Patrick.

Review: In general, I’ve been having a better-than-usual time with mid-grade fantasy adventure stories recently, but unfortunately, The Spindlers didn’t quite make the cut. It’s a fun adventure story, for sure, well-written with well-built and original characters, and some sufficiently creepy bad guys. I’ve got no doubt that kids in the intended age range (maybe 9-10?) would enjoy the heck out of it. However, it was lacking that little something extra to make it engaging for older audiences as well.

To start with, the plot structure felt like something I’d read many times before. It’s pretty standard fantasy adventure quest, reminding me pretty strongly of Gregor the Overlander (the subterranean setting, sibling-saving plot, and giant talking animals make that comparison pretty inevitable), but also reminding variously of The Odyssey, the movie Labyrinth, and the end of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. The heroine has to face a bunch of challenges and trials and prove their wits and bravery and steadfastness, etc; which meant that a lot (all?) of the plot points were pretty predictable. I also got rather tired of the episodic nature of the story, as Liza faces challenge after challenge. I realize that’s in the nature of this type of story, but in this case, I couldn’t see anything bigger binding all of the pieces together. Eventually it started to feel like a Creature Feature, like the entire point was to see how many beasties Oliver could come up with. This may be a point where the audiobook production (which was otherwise very good) lets the story down; maybe if I’d have had the illustrations I would have been more inclined to roll with the story rather than looking for some overarching theme or additional layers.

So, between knowing well ahead of time how the story was going to pan out, and the lack of any deeper or more complex story elements, I found this story unobjectionable, but also not particularly engaging or all that memorable. 2.5 out of 5 stars.

Recommendation: I would have no problem handing this to a mid-grade reader; it’s fun and tells a good story with an interesting sibling dynamic, and I think a lot of kids would really enjoy it. However, for older readers interested in mid-grade fantasy, I’d recommend picking up Gregor the Overlander instead, for a (very) similar adventure story but with a bit more complexity and nuance.

This Review on LibraryThing | This Book on LibraryThing | This Book on Amazon

Other Reviews: Charlotte’s Library, Pages Unbound, Proud Book Nerd and more at the Book Blogs Search Engine.
Have you reviewed this book? Leave a comment with the link and I’ll add it in.

First Line: One night when Liza went to bed, Patrick was her chubby, stubby, candy-grubbing and pancake-loving younger brother, who irritated and amused her both, and the next morning, when she woke up, he was not.

© 2012 Fyrefly’s Book Blog. All Rights Reserved. If you’re reading this on a site other than Fyrefly’s Book Blog or its RSS feed, be aware that this post has been stolen and is being used without permission.

12 Comments leave one →
  1. November 19, 2012 8:19 am

    Thanks for the link to PBN! I agree that it’s more suited to mid-grade readers. If my 9-year-old wasn’t ridiculously afraid of spiders, she’d have read it already! ;-)

    • November 19, 2012 8:24 am

      Heather – Oh, yeah, dis-recommended for arachnophobes, for sure! :)

  2. April Books & Wine permalink
    November 19, 2012 9:47 am

    Oh, that makes me sad that this one isn’t all that great because I am really looking forward to it, but I suppose I can go in with adjusted expectations!

    • December 5, 2012 8:58 am

      April – It’s fine as a mid-grade adventure novel, so if you can enjoy it on that level, you should be good!

  3. November 19, 2012 7:50 pm

    I don’t think the book is for me either but I do love that cover.

    • December 5, 2012 8:59 am

      Kathy – I do too! It makes me wonder what I was missing in the illustrations.

  4. November 23, 2012 3:25 am

    Haven’t read the book, but I do like that first line. I may read it despite the review, just for that!

    • December 5, 2012 9:00 am

      Bookwyrme – It does have a pretty realistic sibling relationship, I think. That’s one of its strong points!

      • December 20, 2012 11:47 pm

        I really enjoyed it. I’ll *probably* write a proper review at some point–have notes & all, but Christmas!–but I thought the writing was strong, especially the sibling relationship. Oliver does a good job of showing love and companionship without leaving out the “Yeah, sometimes, siblings are annoying” part.

        Also, there were some wonderful, lyrical bits in the writing that I admired. Take this bit about storytelling: “, no matter how dark or terrible the pit she found herself in, she could pull herself out, inch by inch and hand over hand, on the long rope of stories.”

        The weak point, I agree, is the creatures: I’m not entirely sure why they were almost-but-not-quite the fairy tale beasties from familiar tales, and I kept wanting to know who this Anna babysitter was that she knew so much.

        Still, I think I enjoyed it more than you did.

        For what it’s worth, I had the published version; the illustrations haven’t particularly stuck with me one way or the other, so I don’t think that was the difference!

      • December 24, 2012 4:50 pm

        Bookwyrme – That’s a good point about Anna – I wonder what her backstory is? Think there’s a prequel in the works?

  5. December 27, 2012 12:15 pm

    Doubt it! Though a prequel might help explain the non-standard portions!

    Got my review up, btw. It’s somewhat in response to yours:


  1. The Spindlers by Lauren Oliver « a little ink

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: