Skip to content

Terry Pratchett – Dodger

November 9, 2012

122. Dodger by Terry Pratchett (2012)

Read By: Stephen Briggs
Length: 10h 31m (368 pages)

Genre: YA Historical Fiction (In his author’s note, Pratchett calls it “historical fantasy”, but there is nothing that I would consider fantasy in this book.)

Started: 15 October 2012
Finished: 29 October 2012

Where did it come from? From the lovely folks at Harper Audio for review.
Why do I have it? Terry Pratchett read by Stephen Briggs has worked out awesomely every time I’ve tried it thus far.

Dodger’s at home in
the sewers, but posh life can
be just as nasty.

Summary: Dodger is a tosher – a member of Victorian London’s underworld (quite literally), who roams the sewers, scavenging for coins, jewelry, and other items of value. He might not exactly be a member of respectable society, but he lives by a certain code. One stormy night he hears a young lady’s cries for help, and emerges from the sewers in time to drive off her attackers. She won’t give her name, but once she’s at a safehouse, she becomes the focus of attention of some very powerful people – a journalist known as Mr. Charlie Dickens, for one. Dodger’s more used to picking the pockets of people like these than attending dinner parties with them, but if the young lady is going to be safe for real, it’s going to take a monumental effort, and all of Dodger’s varied – if slightly disreputable and unsavory – skills.

Review: First things first: I wanted to clear up some misconsceptions I had about this book going in, since I think they might be things that other people are wondering about as well. Namely: no, this is not obviously set in the same world as Nation. It’s set in early Victorian London, not an alternate history. It’s also peopled with a ton of real people from the Victorian era, including Charles Dickens, Henry Mayhew, Benjamin Disraeli, Joseph Baselgette, Robert Peel, and others. Also, no, this is not a fantasy novel. Pratchett calls it “historical fantasy” in his author’s note, but I really didn’t find anything to classify it as such, nor even really much to call it an alternate history. (I mean, Charles Dickens probably didn’t do this stuff in actual history, and I realize that Sweeney Todd was not a real person, but that’s about the extent of it.) There are admittedly a number of extremely unlikely coincidences and happenings, but the closest thing to supernatural or any other kind of fantasy element is the Lady of the Sewers, a goddess/patron saint to whom Dodger occasionally prays.

All that said, it turns out that Pratchett’s just as deft with historical fiction as he is with fantasy. (Or YA historical fiction and YA fantasy; I’ve still read relatively few of his non-YA books.) This book’s got everything one might expect from a Pratchett novel: sympathetic characters, a smart sense of humor, and a down-to-earth perspective on the world and on growing up. It was maybe not as sharply satirical of some of the other of Pratchett’s books that I’ve read, although it made its points quite clearly about choosing who you want to be, and the way in which perception is not truth, particularly the perception of who someone is, and even if it were truth, truth can be shaped and manipulated and looked at from different angles. Sometimes, perhaps, it makes those points a little too clearly; there were times when it seemed like Dodger was repeating himself, having the same revelation he’d had a few chapters ago. But they’re smart revelations that maybe bear repeating, so I didn’t mind too much. There’s also enough action to keep the readers busy, and a surprising depth of character, not only for Dodger, but also for a number of the secondary characters as well.

In short, while I didn’t love this quite as much as Nation or the Tiffany Aching books, I still really enjoyed every minute of listening to it. Stephen Briggs yet again does a wonderful job with the audiobook narration; his dry tone is just a perfect match for Pratchett’s sense of humor. 4 out of 5 stars.

Recommendation: Recommended for Pratchett fans and newbies alike; it’s maybe not his best, but it’s really good. I think fans of Victorian literature are likely to get the biggest kick out of the setting and cameo appearances, but there’s enough else going on that even folks who aren’t typically historical fiction fans should still enjoy themselves.

This Review on LibraryThing | This Book on LibraryThing | This Book on Amazon

Other Reviews: Things Mean a Lot, Tales of the Marvelous
Have you reviewed this book? Leave a comment with the link and I’ll add it in.

First Line: The rain poured down on London so hard that it seemed it was dancing spray, every raindrop contending with its fellow for supremacy in the air and waiting to splash down.

© 2012 Fyrefly’s Book Blog. All Rights Reserved. If you’re reading this on a site other than Fyrefly’s Book Blog or its RSS feed, be aware that this post has been stolen and is being used without permission.

About these ads
12 Comments leave one →
  1. November 9, 2012 7:23 am

    I wish I had a link for where I saw him say that despite the historical characters (and Nation references some too), this was also a slightly alternate history world, because I could swear I saw that somewhere. Maybe it was at the event I attended?

    • November 9, 2012 7:26 am

      Though obviously authorial intent means what it means, and there aren’t many overt indications in the text one way or another. I just wanted to say my brain (probably) didn’t randomly make that up :P

    • November 9, 2012 8:46 am

      Ana – No, I totally believe you that he said that; even in the author’s note he calls it historical fantasy (which I’m interpreting as “alternate history” rather than “Dickens with magic”). And it may be because I’m not well-enough versed in the actual history to spot the changes, but to me it read as no different from the sort of minor tweaks of timeline and circumstance that any historical fiction author makes.

      • November 9, 2012 10:02 am

        I definitely do get what you mean – and also why emphasising the historical fantasy aspect could make people approach the book with the wrong sort of expectations and be disappointed. And that would be a real shame, because while not one of his very best this is still a great read.

  2. November 9, 2012 3:48 pm

    I’ve borrowed this one from a friend and, even if it’s not quite as good as Tiffany Aching, I’m looking forward to reading it. I like Victorians and I like Pratchett, so it can’t go too far wrong.

    • November 19, 2012 8:27 am

      Meghan – Oh, I think you’ll really like it; “not quite as good as Tiffany Aching” is still really good, especially for Victorian fans.

  3. November 11, 2012 12:24 pm

    I really need to get some Pratchett read…

    • November 19, 2012 8:28 am

      Kailana – As in you haven’t read any?!? Then definitely! I’d recommend starting with Nation, or maybe The Wee Free Men, although this one wouldn’t be a bad choice either.

  4. November 24, 2012 11:12 pm

    “Not his best, but really good” puts it very well–and when Pratchett’s best is SO good, really good is still, well, *really* good! :) Thanks for the review, and for linking to mine.

    • December 5, 2012 8:54 am

      cheryl – Exactly! There are a number of authors for whom “not their best” is still better than 90% of the other books out there.

Trackbacks

  1. Dodging Through Victorian London | Tales of the Marvelous
  2. Short Story Review Roundup: February – July 2013 | Fyrefly's Book Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 953 other followers

%d bloggers like this: